This “bubble within the bubble” is meant for law firms >$2 million in gross revenue. It’s meant to be an ongoing and regular peer-to-peer board of advisors. It’s meant to help the owner of a fast-growing multimillion dollar law firm navigate the unfamiliar waters that lay ahead.

At around $2 million things begin to change…a lot… AGAIN. The only big difference between a $2 and 5 million dollar firm is mindset. Functionally, operationally, practically speaking it’s essentially the same thing. But something changes at $2 million (or more specifically, if something doesn’t change around that point it tends to cause all kinds of problems as just about everyone with a $2 million dollar firm and higher, can attest to).

There will always be a topical lesson or two to share. However, the main attraction is that each participant will get an hour on the hot seat to bring something important that they’re working on, an important or even a critical decision, a plan to get feedback about, etc. to the group whose own multimillion dollar law firm qualifies each of them to have a seat at that table offering you the practical benefits of their experience.

Some might also argue that the main attraction is the opportunity to see what challenges, issues and opportunities other multimillion dollar law firm owners are being challenged with, distracted with, or excited by and the feedback, lessons and insights you’ll get from observing and maybe even offering them feedback when it’s their turn on the hot seat.

And others could argue that getting to go to breakfast and dinner and just hanging-out with a group like this in a casual environment with the free-flow of ideas and opportunities, was one of the highlights for them.
And further still, it could be argued that one of the biggest draws is the opportunity to share lessons, insights and practical experiences with your peers to help them avoid making some of the same mistakes you did in growing your law firm without access to this sort of group of peer advisors. This is a group of “givers” not “takers”.